The Declaration of Independance

We-The-People.us.com

The standard oath of office.
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; That I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; That I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservationn or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me GOD.


Excerpt from the Declaration of Independance

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume amoung the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that amoung these are life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted amoung Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the RIGHT of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principals and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security. - Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

END of excerpt from our original declaration of independance.

 

Functions of our Government: Among the many functions and duties that any form of government should and must provide are the things that are generally consider the basics of survival and required to provide a secure and stabile environment for the people.
Chief among these duties of government are of course security and a strong national defense.
It is also the responsibility and the duty of the Government to provide a stabile and strong form of currency.

These of course are not the only duties and responsibilities of a good government.

Special interests and immeasurable corruption;
When governments no longer serve the people, no longer provide security, and serve only those who govern and their own special interest, then it has come to a point that the people must throw off those who have been elected to lead but who have instead become the corruptors of government.
The government take over of the US auto industry was engineered and orchestrated for the special interests of the leaders of the United Autoworkers Unions alone. When the auto industry profits were no longer sufficient to support the levels of retired workers benefit pension plans and other union obligations and expenses, the unions were threatened with bankruptcy. The government takeover allowed the union and government leaders to manipulate the system so that the American people now pay for and support the benefit retirement plans of the autoworkers and the payroll and expense plans of the union leaders.

This level of corruption by and of itself would not typically be sufficient cause for the people to cast out the elected leaders, but it could be a contributing factor if other circumstances also prevailed.
 

Excerpt from an article posted on wikipedia.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment

Main article: Impeachment in the United States;
Similar to the British system, Article One of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power of impeachment and the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. Unlike the British system, impeachment is only the first of two stages, and conviction requires a two-thirds vote. Impeachment does not necessarily result in removal from office; it is only a legal statement of charges, parallel to an indictment in criminal law. An official who is impeached faces a second legislative vote (whether by the same body or another), which determines conviction, or failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment. Most constitutions require a supermajority to convict. Although the subject of the charge is criminal action, it does not constitute a criminal trial; the only question under consideration is the removal of the individual from office, and the possibility of a subsequent vote preventing the removed official from ever again holding political office in the jurisdiction where he was removed. Impeachment with respect to political office should not be confused with witness impeachment.

Impeachable offenses
In the United States, impeachment can occur both at the federal and state level. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may only be impeached and removed for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors". Several commentators have suggested that Congress alone may decide for itself what constitutes an impeachable offense In 1970, then-House Minority Leader Gerald R. Ford defined the criterion as he saw it: "An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history."[4] Four years later, Ford would become president when President Richard Nixon resigned under the threat of impeachment.
Article III of the Constitution states that judges remain in office "during good behaviour", implying that Congress may remove a judge for bad behavior via impeachment. The House has impeached 14 federal judges and the Senate has convicted six of them.
Officials subject to impeachment

The central question regarding the Constitutional dispute about the impeachment of members of the legislature is whether members of Congress are officers of the United States. The Constitution grants the House the power to impeach "The President, the Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States." [3] It has been suggested that members of Congress are not officers of the United States.[5] Others, however, believe that members are civil officers and are subject to impeachment.[citation needed]
The House of Representatives did impeach a senator once:[6] Senator William Blount, in 1798. The Senate expelled Senator Blount and, after initially hearing his impeachment, dismissed the charges for lack of jurisdiction.[7] Left unsettled was the question whether members of Congress were civil officers of the United States. The House has not impeached a Member of Congress since Blount. As each House has the authority to expel its own members without involving the other chamber, expulsion has been the method used for removing Members of Congress.

Jefferson's Manual, which is integral to the Rules of the House of Representatives,[8] states that impeachment is set in motion by charges made on the floor, charges preferred by a memorial, a member's resolution referred to a committee, a message from the president, charges transmitted from the legislature of a state or territory or from a grand jury, or from facts developed and reported by an investigating committee of the House. It further states that a proposition to impeach is a question of high privilege in the House and at once supersedes business otherwise in order under the rules governing the order of business.
Process

The impeachment process is a two-step procedure. The House of Representatives must first pass by a simple majority articles of impeachment, which constitute the formal allegation or allegations. Upon their passage, the defendant has been "impeached". Next, the Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a president, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. For the impeachment of any other official, the Constitution is silent on who shall preside, suggesting that this role falls to the Senate's usual presiding officer. This may include the impeachment of the vice president, although legal theories suggest that allowing a defendant to be the judge in his own case would be a blatant conflict of interest. If the Vice President did not preside over an impeachment (of anyone besides the President), the duties would fall to the President pro tempore of the Senate.
To convict the accused, a two-thirds majority of the senators present is required. Conviction automatically removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring him from holding future federal office, elected or appointed. Conviction by the Senate does not bar criminal prosecution. Even after an accused has left office, it is possible to impeach to disqualify the person from future office or from certain emoluments of his prior office (such as a pension). If there is no charge for which a two-thirds majority of the senators present vote "guilty", the defendant is acquitted and no punishment is imposed.

History of Federal Impeachment Proceedings in the United States
Congress regards impeachment as a power to be used only in extreme cases; the House has initiated impeachment proceedings only 64 times since 1789 (most recently against Judge Thomas Porteous of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana), and only the following 19 federal officials have been under threat of impeachment by congress (and some of them have been impeached):

· Two presidents:
1) Andrew Johnson, Democrat, was impeached in 1868 after violating the then-newly created Tenure of Office Act. President Johnson was acquitted by the Senate, falling one vote short of the necessary 2/3 needed to remove him from office, voting 35-19 to remove him. The Tenure of Office Act would later be found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in dicta.
2) Bill Clinton, Democrat, was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on articles charging perjury (specifically, lying to a federal grand jury) by a 228-206 vote, and obstruction of justice by a 221-212 vote. The House rejected other articles. One was a count of perjury in a civil deposition in Paula Jones's sexual harassment lawsuit against Clinton (by a 205-229 vote) and an article which accused Clinton of abuse of power by a 48-285 vote. President Clinton was acquitted by the Senate on February 12, 1999. The Senate vote fell short of the necessary 2/3 needed to remove him from office, voting 45-55 to remove him on obstruction of justice and 50-50 on perjury.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment

It is the goals and intentions of the writers and creators of this Internet web site to facilitate and otherwise bring about the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama, and to further bring criminal charges as listed and indicated below against Barack Obama and also against those individuals also listed here. This list is not all conclusive and potential charges of treason or other criminal charges should not be considered as limited strictly to those individuals included in this list.

Articles of Impeachment:
Barrack Hussein Obama
(And charges of criminal offenses and activities)

1. Conspiracy and intent to defraud; RE: General Motors, Chrysler Corporation, and the American Auto industry, UAW Autoworkers unions.

2. Racketeering: Un-Constitutional and Illegal seizure of private property; RE: General Motors, Chrysler Corporation.

3. Racketeering and Conspiracy to Defraud: RE: Healthcare; Willful and intentional overthrow and attempt to destroy American private insurance and health care industry. Conspiracy to defraud the American people, RE: SEIU and union leader Andy Stern.

4. Racketeering, Fraud, Un-Constitutional and Illegal seizure of private property. RE: Gulf oil wells, Private Oil industry assets, RE: PetroBrazil, George Soros investments. RE: Obama administration ban/moratorium on Gulf oil drilling, Forced closure of existing American owned oil company assets located in the Gulf of Mexico. Financial contributions to Petro-Brazil.

5. Derelictions of duty, failures to secure the US - Mexican border. RE: Illegal immigration.

6. Interfering with a Sovereign state and the states rights to self-defense of its citizens. RE: State of Arizona, And Arizona law to enforce immigration and the states right and obligations to defend it population against violent illegal drug smugglers.

7. Obstruction of Justice: Deliberate and willful attempt to impede and obstruct the duties of sovereign states dully-elected law enforcement official from enforcing both state and federal immigration laws. RE: Arizona County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

8. Interferring with the sovereignty of the State of Arizona: RE: The Obama administration's state department reporting of Arizona's immigration law to the United Nations for alleged "human rights violations", an entity which has no juristiction or authority over the States or over this Country.

9. Dereliction of duty and failure to carryout the duties of his office of President of The United States of America, failure to comply with the oath of office under the Constitution of the United States: RE: Failure to provide a stabile form of currency; Excessive deficit spending and deliberate attempt to devalue the American currency system. RE: Cloward and Piven plan to destroy the American economy, "Overwhelm the system".

10. Attempt to destroy American Economy and private industry: RE: CAP & TRADE and Climate Change legislation. RE: EPA rules and legislation regulating industry.

11. Conspiracy to overthrow the Constitution and Sovereignty of the United States of America. RE: Obama administrations planed attempt to redistribute the wealth and sovereignty of the Nation through the United Nations. RE: CAP & TRADE and Climate Control legislation.

12. Endangering American Defense and security and the defense and security of America's closest ally: RE: Obama Administration recent actions in regards to Israel and his Anti-Semitic positions towards Israel.

13. Endangering American Military personal while serving in harms way in Afganistan: RE: Obama's failure to make timely and expedient decisions regarding troop levels increases requested by Military commanders.

14. Treason: RE: Items 6, 8, 9, 10, 11. All of these grievances occurring during a time when the United States is at war against terrorists.

15. Treason, and Conspiracy to commit treason. RE: Attempts and planed legislation to regulate free speach and free commerce over the Internet. RE: Cass Sunstein regulations regarding the Internet.

 


Defendant; Barrack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America.
Co-defendants and co-conspirators;
Representative Nancy Pelosi, California, Chairmen of the Congressional House of Representatives.
Senator Harry Reid, Navada, Chairman of the Senate.
Representative Barney Frank, Massachusetts, Chairman of the house financial Services committee.
Andy Stern; Former President of SEIU.
Valerie Jarrett, Advisor to President Obama.
George Soros, Hungarian-American currency speculator, stock investor and polital contributor. Reported to hold extensive stock assets in Petro-Brazil.
Cass Sunstein, Advisor to President Obama, Administrator of the White House Office of information and Regulatory Affairs under the Obama administration.
Al Gore, Former Vice-President of the United States.
Hillary Clinton: Secretary of State under the Obama administration.

This list of individuals is not and should not be considered as complete, and the list of individuals who may be indicted under various criminal charges should not be considered limited to those listed here.

 

 
State of Texas Nullification of Un Agenda 21;